Court of Appeals candidate
Judge
Lisa Neubauer
is a Constitutional infidel*
*Constitutional infidel
a person who does not follow or adhere to the U.S.
constitution,
when in the judicuary - a judicial scofflaw.
when in the judicuary - a judicial scofflaw.
Don't take our word on it,
the court
records and facts speak for themselves.
Citizen Neubauer at 21 years old complained about
her
individual civil rights being violated by the Chicago Police Department and the story is compelling.
individual civil rights being violated by the Chicago Police Department and the story is compelling.
We want you to watch the video judge Neubauer produced !
Judge Neubauer's opening statement in the above
facebook video is thought provoking:
"I realized in a very personal way how important the
courts are in protecting peoples rights"
courts are in protecting peoples rights"
But later in life as a judge, Judge Neubauer had no problem violating civil and state rights of an entire state population !
Here are the facts:
Current
Court of Appeals case # 2018AP1189
was a
completely sealed court case until a motion to intervene was filed to open the court records.
Parties:
Sandra Weidner vs. City of Racine
Racine County Circuit court Case #17CV1644
Court of Appeals case # 18AP1189
Judge Lisa Neubauer sealed the complete court record
contrary to law a created an illegal secret court, the court docketing #, name of parties, court schedules and hearing records were all sealed for months without legal foundation.
contrary to law a created an illegal secret court, the court docketing #, name of parties, court schedules and hearing records were all sealed for months without legal foundation.
The sealing of the court record was contrary to the U.S. Constitution and Wisconsin statutes, violating U. S. Civil rights and Wisconsin statutory rights of every citizen in Wisconsin.
Below was the "CCAP" inquiry response dated 3-11-2019
There was no legal basis to seal the entire court record,
yet Judge Eugene Gasiorkiewicz in the Circuit Court
and Judge Lisa Neubauer in the Court of Appeals did so
and Judge Lisa Neubauer in the Court of Appeals did so
in order
to conduct court proceedings in secret.
WHAT IS
THE GREATER OFFENSE ?
Violating
the rights of one individual or the
rights of
an entire population?
The
population of Wisconsin is around 5.8 million.
Keep this
5.8 million citizens in mind.
Because a
person is a victim of a civil rights violation (as alleged by Lisa Neubauer)
doesn't give that same person the reason to violate an entire population.
1
versus 5.795 million. (2017 Wisconsin census)
Do the math !
1 violated citizen vs. 5.8 million violated citizens.
Judge Neubauer is not only a hypocrite*, she knowingly violated several laws and in the process of engaging in secret court and committed criminal acts in the process.
*hyp·o·crite
Dictionary result for hypocrite
/ˈhipəˌkrit/ noun : a person who indulges in hypocrisy.
"the story tells of a respectable judge who turns out to be a cheat and a hypocrite"
As a citizen, Neubauer fought for her rights,
but as Chief Judge in the Court of Appeals,
she has not fought for you, your neighbor or any
other of our 5.8 million Wisconsin citizens.
Worse yet, Neubauer as Chief judge in the Court of Appeals has attacked your U.S. civil rights and Wisconsin statutory rights by conducting SECRET court, denying you access to court proceedings..
Judge Neubauer as Chief judge of the Court of Appeals sealed the entire court record within her court.
(The Court of Appeals chief judge handles
administrative matters for the entire Court of Appeals while
continuing to participate fully in deciding cases. source: https://wicourts.gov/courts/appeals/)
Conducting
court in secrecy is unconstitutional and violates Wisconsin statutes 757.14
and 59.20(3) The first amendment of the U.S. Constitution and Wisconsin
Supreme Court Rules (SCR).
Wisconsin Statute
757.14 “The sittings of every court
shall be public and every citizen may freely attend the same……”
Citizens are directly empowered by statute 757.14 to observe court proceedings.
Wisconsin Statute 59.20(3), The court shall:
" open to the examination of any person all books and papers required to be kept in his or her office and permit any person so examining to take notes and copies of such books, records, papers or minutes ...."
" open to the examination of any person all books and papers required to be kept in his or her office and permit any person so examining to take notes and copies of such books, records, papers or minutes ...."
Citizens are directly empowered by statute 59.20(3) to the
opening of the Circuit Court record to public examination.
Supreme Court Rules - 60 Preamble. Our legal system is based on the principle that an
independent, fair and competent judiciary
will interpret and apply the laws that govern us. The
role of the judiciary is central to American concepts of justice and the rule
of law. Intrinsic to all provisions of this Code
are the precepts that judges, individually and collectively, must respect and
honor the judicial office as a public trust and strive to enhance and maintain
confidence in our legal system. The judge is an arbiter of
facts and law for the resolution of disputes and a highly visible symbol of
government under the rule of law.
of the judiciary.
of impropriety in all of
the judge's activities.
impartially
and diligently.
The First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution
guarantees
that American court proceedings are
presumptively open to the public.
The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled and explained the public's
presumptive right of access to court proceedings is rooted in both logic and
history.
SAY NO TO SECRET COURTS !
Say no to Judge Neubauer
Say no to Judge Neubauer
Be
an informed electorate !
Additional reading references:
Read
further how Judge Lisa Neubauer denied citizens their
Constitutional
rights to due process and protection from unreasonable searches as a Court of
Appeals judge.
Honest, Open & Transparent Government is only click away:
Comments
Post a Comment